Permanent Telescope Pier

When getting ready to photograph the sky a significant amount of time is spent setting up the mount. This eats into exposure time and on marginal nights becomes a decision point on whether it’s worth setting up at all. I decided to build a permanent pier in my backyard for my trusty Orion Sirius mount to make setup quicker and hopefully get in more exposure time.

Pier Design

I started by designing the steel pier itself. As is often the case with my projects, this led to a significant tangent. I wanted to do the design with a CAD program, but that wasn’t really part of my “current skill set.” I had learned and used AutoCAD a little bit many years ago, but now what I need is a “simple” 2D CAD software that’s free. I did some digging and came up with NanoCAD. There’s a bit of a learning curve, but there are excellent tutorial videos and copious information to be found online. It’s similar to what I remember from old versions of AutoCAD; in the end I’m happy with it and totally recommend it.

Having designed a lovely pier I set about finding a welder. An acquaintances’ son is a welder, and I got in touch and sent him my drawing and asked for a price. I was truly shocked with the price he gave me, although I admit I had not thought realistically about what it would actually cost. The project came to a screeching halt in the middle of the phone call, and I had to apologize that I was out of my depth on cost. I made it clear I didn’t question the value of his skills – I know enough to appreciate a welder’s skills – but the number was out of question for me. Good fellow that he is, within a week he had found some leftover material that was in fact slightly better than what I had specified, and he worked a price for me that I could just barely get my wallet around. I was back in business!

P.S. If you ever need a welder in Dutchess County, NY, Dan Winne is your man! (email me for contact info)

A few days later I picked it up – truly beautiful as raw steel, but I knew I would need to paint it for protection.

Now I had to dig a hole for the footing. I’ve done enough hole-digging to be worried, but there was no cure for it except to do it. That was a full Saturday project. Very much like real work!

40″ Deep by 22″ Diameter

The footing needs some concrete…

Steel Reinforcement for the Footing
Laying out steel and sonotube – X,Y and N-S
Yup that’s a hole alright

Bolt Jig
Concrete Poured and Bolts Set

The steel pier needs some holes drilled. For the base we need 11/16 holes. The bottom plate is 3/8″ thick. This is not going to be easy.

Drill Press Setup
More holes

Now we need a piece to fit the telescope mount to the top of the pier. There are some nice fancy aluminum ones available but they’re quite pricey. I saw that a couple of people had tried 3D printing these, but I didn’t see any follow-ups to say how well they worked. While less than ideal for stability, I decided it was worth a try for the potential cost savings. I’m lucky my friend Bill has a 3D printer, so I designed a part as sturdy as I could, and will print in with 100% infill for added strength.

Pier Adapter

Bill tells me it’s going to take NINE HOURS AND TWENTY-SEVEN MINUTES to print this thing so I’ll be back when we see the result.

Check back for updates!

California Nebula

California Nebula 12/10/2020

The California Nebula in Perseus.

Inspired by my wide-field of Perseus from Saturday I went for a closer view of this beauty. This is an emission nebula 1000 light years away. It is “lit up” (technically the hydrogen atoms are excited by radiation, hence “emission”) by the bright star Menkeb just below it in this image.

This is taken with a beautiful old Takumar 200mm f4 lens from the early 70’s. As a side note, there’s a whole subculture of astrophotographers using vintage lenses that I stumbled upon a couple of years ago. They’re abandoned by mainstream photographers due to camera incompatibility and lack of autofocus, but those are irrelevant to this purpose. I found this lens on ebay for $26 and I’ve gotten some wonderful shots with it.

Technical:
Takumar 200mm f4, stopped down to f8
Baader Moon & Skyglow Neodymium (light pollution) filter
Canon 550D(a) camera
Orion Sirius mount
48x90s exposures

For those that are interested in the vintage lens thing, here are some useful links:
http://www.nightofmanywords.com/articles/budget-lenses-for-astrophotography
https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/astrophotography-with-the-super-takumar.125446/
There’s a site devoted to vintage Pentax lenses that has detailed analysis of the individual lenses and variants: https://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/S-M-C-Super-Takumar-200mm-F4.html

See high res of this and other starry pics at https://www.astrobin.com/users/jim@ping23.com/

Technical Notes:

Subs: 90s exposures at ISO 800.

Focusing Issues:

After 16 subs, finding myself disappointed with the focus, I decided to try to improve it. Here are closups from before (first 2) and after (second 2) subs (unprocessed):


It’s entirely possible that I improved the focus through the laborious process, but not by much.

Focusing images:

The following are unprocessed images of the star Menkeb from a session on the California Nebula 2020-12-10. These were taken for the purpose of focusing and are not the same exposure parameters as the subs. 30s exposures at ISO 1600.

The star is too faint to properly observe with a Bhatinov mask in live view, though it might have been of assistance using focusing exposures. (Another thing to try.)

The progression was not very systematic but generally moved from slightly outside of focus to  slightly inside and back to the “happiest” spot, as observed during the session.